![]() In each case, customers with earlier 737 models expected that the newest model would require minimal differences training. The 737 family was fundamentally refreshed three times: Classic, NG, and MAX. Should the 737 MAX’s now-infamous Maneuvering Augmentation Characteristics System (MCAS) implementation have been applied to the stabilizer? Did Boeing have a better choice?įlying qualities approved “to the letter”, quantitatively, are balanced by qualitative measures, with latitude in judging acceptable performance. The 737 seems to have diverged from the other Boeing airplanes progressively. The 737-100 was a marvel by fitting the engine tight under the wing, and every generation since has marveled at how to fit the latest engine under the wing.Įvery swept wing air transport suffers growing pains, working out issues with flying qualities. The 757 should have saved Boeing from endless 737 generations, but the will of the customer changed its trajectory from the start, in the end leaving no mark at all. A new type certificate is a costly and lengthy process, with considerable risk. Source: Boeing.Ĭhanges that jeopardized an amended Federal Aviation Administration Type Certificate were culled. Its development was 60 years in the making. The Boeing 737 MAX became Boeing’s most controversial commercial aircraft. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |